Sunrise associates v. govt. of nct of delhi
WebDec 3, 2024 · The Constitution Bench in Sunrise Associates has categorically held that lottery is actionable claim after due consideration which is ratio of the judgment. The … WebSunrise Associates vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 28 April, 2006 Author: Ruma Pal Bench: Ruma Pal, B.N. Srikrishna, S.H. Kapadia, Tarun Chatterjee, P.P. Naolekar CASE NO.: …
Sunrise associates v. govt. of nct of delhi
Did you know?
WebJul 13, 2024 · In Sunrise Associates v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi on 28 th April 2006, SC, Supreme Court held: The right to participate in a draw is a beneficial interest in movable property. The object of the participants would be to win the prize. Transfer of right is thus a beneficial interest in movable property not in possession. WebSunrise Associates vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 28 April, 2006. Citedby 2 docs Aboobacker vs R.T.A. on 26 November, 2004. R. Natarajan vs State Transport Appellate ... on 7 October, 1998 ... Single judge is in consonance with the Constitution Bench decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sunrise Associates v. Government of NCT of Delhi ...
WebMar 4, 2024 · Government of NCT of Delhi v Union of India. The Supreme Court will decide whether the provisions introduced by The Government of National Capital Territory … WebMay 7, 2024 · The Delhi High Court 22 relying on the Supreme Court's ruling in the McDermott Case held that the decision of the arbitral tribunal, which comprised of engineers, to apply the Hudson's formula cannot be faulted merely because they had chosen to rely on the formula to calculate damages and the objection raised purely on the basis …
WebConstitution Bench of this Court in Sunrise Associates Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors., (2006) 5 SCC 603 has categorically held that lottery is not a good. When Constitution Bench has held that lottery is not a good, the provisions of Act, 2024 treating the lottery as goods is … WebJun 1, 2024 · Of NCT of Delhi & Others, H. Anraj v. Government of Tamil Nadu, there has been an elaborate discussion on what qualifies to be goods. Goods have certain features which include a. That the property has an intrinsic value of its own; b. Is not contended to be actionable claim; and c.
WebIn Pintu Mandal v State (Bail Appln. 3708/2024), the Delhi High Court was pleased to grant bail to the Petitioner who was accused of offences under Section…
WebIt relied on the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Sunrise Associates v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2006-VIL-11-SC wherein it was held that lottery is not ‘goods’. It also contended that exclusion of lottery, betting and gambling from Para 6 of the Schedule III of the huntington library mission recordsWebHon'ble Supreme Court in Sunrise Associates V. Govt. of NCT of New Delhi and others (AIR 2006 SC 1908) , in which earlier ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in H. Anraj V. huntington library pasadena free admissionWebM/S. Sunrise Associates Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors [2006] Insc 255 (28 April 2006) 2006 Latest Caselaw 255 SC Citation : 2006 Latest Caselaw 255 SC Judgement Date : Apr/2006 … huntington library membership fee